Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | FENG Leo | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
2 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
3 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
3 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 20% |
5 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 42% | 9% |
6 | MAY Griffin M. | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% |
7 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
8 | CHEONG Heonjun | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
9 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | - | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 18% |
10 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
11 | SU Landon | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% |
12 | HU Christopher | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
13 | PAN Alex | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - |
14 | BROU Inkosi | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
15 | YAN William | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 5% |
16 | PATEL Rayn | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
17 | DECK Tyson | 7% | 32% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - |
18 | WANG Oscar | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
19 | GUREVICH Savely | 38% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
20 | DESAI Dhilan | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
21 | GUAN Dennis | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
22 | HUNG Samuel | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
23 | WANG Max | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
24 | GAUVEY Kieran | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
25 | TIAGI George | 11% | 40% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
26 | WONG Caleb W. | 16% | 51% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | TIAGI Daniel | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
27 | MILLER Felix | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
29 | BREUER Daniel | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
30 | MEYTIN Maxwell S. | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.