Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JING Alexandra | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
2 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 62% | |
3 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | - | 9% | 40% | 51% | |
3 | JING Emily | - | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 55% |
5 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
6 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% | |
7 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 16% | |
8 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 2% | 23% | 45% | 26% | 3% |
9 | WU Julianna Y. | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
10 | HALL Velma | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
11 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 1% | 15% | 42% | 35% | 6% |
12 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
13 | XUE Alanna L. | - | - | 6% | 50% | 39% | 6% | |
14 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 2% | 31% | 53% | 14% | |
15 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% | |
16 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
17 | LI Meilin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 44% | 11% |
18 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 32% | 5% |
19 | RENTON Samantha | - | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% | |
20 | JANG Kimberley | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 16% | |
21 | HUANG NATALIE | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | DU Hannah | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 28% | 4% | |
23 | DATLA Meha | 31% | 52% | 16% | < 1% | - | - | |
24 | QIAN Zhiyan | 4% | 29% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
25 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
26 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 1% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 42% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
28 | YU Lauren C. | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
29 | KETTELLE Molly | 40% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
30 | WANG Ashley | 2% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | LIU Siyuan | - | - | 5% | 34% | 43% | 17% | 1% |
32 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 2% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 4% | 30% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
34 | MEI Sarah | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | |
35 | HSIEH Rebecca | 6% | 34% | 52% | 7% | - | - | |
36 | YANG Lingting | 14% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
37 | MADSEN Ansley | 27% | 52% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
38 | KRUPENKO Sabrina R. | 12% | 43% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
39 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 54% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | DUVVURI Oorvi | 41% | 47% | 12% | - | - | - | |
41 | ZULUETA Catherine | 26% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
42 | DATLA Medha | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
43 | WANG Cynthia | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
43 | ZARE Yasmin | 46% | 45% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.