Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHENG Evelyn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
2 | LEE Alina | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
3 | LAU Sydnee M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
3 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
5 | UYANIK Nerine | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
6 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
7 | WU Kyra | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
8 | WANG Catherine K. | 1% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
9 | LI Phoebe J. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
10 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
11 | KOROL Dana | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
12 | LAU Chloe M. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
13 | CHENG Lydia A. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% | |
14 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
15 | CHO Gracie L. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
16 | YEH Marissa E. | - | 6% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
17 | KONG Olivia | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
18 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
19 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
20 | SOOD Ishani | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
21 | KIM Alyssa | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
22 | TONG Ophelia | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
23 | ALTEN Ayaka | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
24 | TAN Clarisse | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | DUAN Konnie | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
26 | YU Seneca | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
27 | SHIH Diane | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
28 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 1% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
29 | RAMAN Tanvi | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
30 | KOROL Neta | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
31 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
32 | YIN Helen | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
33 | HO Rachel E. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
34 | SU Alysa J. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
35 | HOLMGREN Tegan L. | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
36 | VOHRA Anusha | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | FUNG Carina W. | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
38 | CUI Melody J. | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
39 | HOBSON Leena | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | LIN Joyce | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
41 | HSIUNG Samantha | 50% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
42 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
43 | DIERKS Kaya | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
44 | HO Katherine | 19% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
45 | ANDERSON Lisa | 20% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
46 | KALAS Maria | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.