Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
2 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 52% | 23% | |
3 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 55% | 30% |
3 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | - | - | - | 5% | 42% | 53% |
5 | JUNG Irene | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
6 | CHIN Elise | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
7 | XU Ellen | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% | |
8 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
9 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 16% | |
10 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
11 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
12 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
13 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 39% | 8% |
14 | TSOI Julie | - | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
15 | HUANG MADELINE | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
16 | MANN Sophia J. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
17 | WIGGINS Yaanathia | 1% | 11% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
18 | TONG Jessie | 1% | 17% | 52% | 27% | 4% | - | |
19 | WANG Zidan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
20 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
21 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
22 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
23 | CHO Michelle | 51% | 42% | 7% | < 1% | - | - | |
24 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
25 | TUNG Renee | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 23% | 2% | - |
26 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 38% | 47% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | YANG Lea | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
28 | CHANG Audrey | - | 3% | 23% | 49% | 22% | 3% | |
29 | DAVIS Jayna M. | - | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
30 | GOMES Diana C. | - | 6% | 36% | 41% | 15% | 2% | |
31 | NOVICK Mia J. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
32 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
33 | FREY Sarah E. | 4% | 28% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
34 | LIN Grace | 22% | 52% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
35 | SAAD Alia | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
36 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
37 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 56% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | |
38 | YAO Rainie | 23% | 52% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | OLKO Sophie | 31% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | LIN Lauren | 4% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | REGANTI Sitara | 22% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
42 | NEELEY Leilani | 32% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
42 | WANG Jasmine | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
42 | KIM Elyssa | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
45 | KIM Olive | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
46 | MCCOY Audrey (Zoe) | 52% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.