Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WANG Eric Y. | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
2 | WILSON Jude | V V D V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
3 | SIMAK Joseph P. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | ZHENG Edward L. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
5 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
6 | JIANG Anthony | D V V V D V | V V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
7 | HUANG Ethan F. | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
8 | KIM Alexander M. | V D D V D | V V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
9 | BERRIO Carter E. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
10 | CHON Taylor A. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
11 | ZHANG Derek | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
12 | SHOMAN Noah | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
13 | JI Cody Walter | D V V D V V | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
14 | DENG Andrew | D D D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
15 | HOLZ William A. | D V D D D V | V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
16 | NG Jeremiah | D D D V D | V V V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
17 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
18 | YUN Jake | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
19 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
20 | QIU Nathan | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
20 | MICLAUS Justin | V V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
22 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
23 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
24 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
25 | BLEYMAN David | V D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
26 | REN James | V V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
27 | LEE Aydan J. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
28 | CHOI Silas | V V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
29 | HOLZ Daniel | V D D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
30 | COOK Cole | D D D V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
31 | LEE Justin | D D V D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
32 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | D D D V D D | V V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
33 | LIN Daniel | V V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
34 | ERMAKOV Lev | V V V V V V | D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
35 | HJERPE Wade H. | D V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
36 | WANG Robert | V D V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
37 | KOGAN Benjamin | V V V V D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
38 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
39 | STURN Oliver | V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
40 | BAE Jason I. | D V V V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
41 | WANG Nicolas | D V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
42 | DEPEW Spencer | V V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
43 | SAVOY Luca | D V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
44 | WOODWARD Connor | D V D V V V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
45 | MEHTA Krish | D D V V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
46 | KIM Shaun M. | V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
47 | FENG Leo | V D V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
48 | CHEONG Heonjun | D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
49 | DUDNICK Christian | D V V V D D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
50 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
51 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
52 | ZENG Noah | D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
53 | SU Landon | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
54 | PENG Bryan | V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
55 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
56 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | D V D V D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
56 | KUMAR Sachit | V D D D V D | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
58 | VOSS Jeffer | D D V D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
59 | KILGALLEN William | D D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
60 | POSY Daniel | V D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
61 | CHTERENTAL Alex | D D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
62 | DILLE Jackson K. | D D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
63 | HOTHA Nikhil | D D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
64 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
65 | CANNON Logan T. | V V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
65 | FLITSANOV Macabee | D V V V D D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
67 | BROU Inkosi | V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
68 | GOLD Carter | V D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
69 | HU Christopher | D D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
70 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
71 | CHEEMA Hyder | V D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
71 | TANG Charles | D V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
73 | PATIL Aaryan A. | V D D D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
74 | HUANG Maxwell H. | V D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
75 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
76 | BERA Enzo | V D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
77 | WALKE Devin | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
78 | OH Triton | D V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
79 | CHAN Aidan | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
79 | YAN William | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
81 | JORGESON Charlie | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
82 | KANG evan | D D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
83 | KROON Lucas | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
83 | KIRCHMAIER Charlie | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
85 | DECK Tyson | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
86 | LIGH Checed | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
86 | RODGERS Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.