May NAC

Cadet Women's Saber

Friday, May 7, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 PAK Kaitlyn V V V V V D V V V V V V 5.4 5 -0.4
2 FOUR-GARCIA Madison D V V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
3 BUHAY Rachel T. V D V D D V V V V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
3 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
5 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V D D V V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
6 TAO Hannah J. V V V V D D V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
7 OISHI Megumi D V D V V V V V V V D 5.3 4 -1.3
8 SHEARER Natalie E. D V D V V D V V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
9 NEWELL Alexia C. V V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
10 STONE Hava S. V V V D V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
11 TZOU Alexandra V V V V V D V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
12 BOIS Adele V V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
13 MOZHAEVA MARIA V D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
14 CARVALHO Isabela A. V D V V D V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
15 BALAKUMARAN Maya V V D V D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
16 CHIOLDI Mina V D D V V V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
17 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
18 SHOMAN Miriam V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
19 ANDRES Charmaine G. V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
20 MIKA Veronica V V D V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
21 KALRA Himani V. V V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
22 LI Amanda C. V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
23 GREENBAUM Ella K. D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
24 TIMOFEYEV Nicole V V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
25 YANG Ashley M. V D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
26 VESTEL Mira B. V D V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
27 LEE Alexandra B. D V V V V D V V D 5.3 4 -1.3
28 MARSEE Samantha V D V D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
29 WIGGERS Susan Q. D V D V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
30 SHOMAN Jenna D D V D V V V V D 5.2 3 -2.2
31 GHAYALOD reya V D D V V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
32 ATLURI Sara V. D D V V D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
33 BLUM Leah I. V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
34 YONG Erika E. V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
35 SZETO Chloe V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
36 GORMAN Victoria M. V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
37 JULIEN Michelle V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
38 GRAFF Sophie V V V V V D D 2.6 5 +2.4
39 LIU Sophie V V V V D D 1.3 4 +2.7
40 MANSPERGER Leena V V D V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
41 WU Erica L. V D V V V D D 4.1 4 -0.1
42 NOVICK Mia J. V V V D D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
43 JOHNSON Lauren V V V V D D D 3.7 4 +0.3
44 PAUL Lila D V V V V D D 3.8 4 +0.2
44 DANK Dina D V V V D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
46 CHANG Josephine S. V D V V V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
46 NEIBART Fiona V D V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
48 LIAO Siwen D V D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
49 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn D V D V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
50 SINHA Anika D V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
51 WANG Jianning D D V V V V D 1.2 3 +1.8
52 LI Victoria J. V V V D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
53 WEI Vivian W. V V V D D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
54 LUKASHENKO Angelina V D D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
55 LU Amy D V V D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
56 SOURIMTO Valeria V V D D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
57 BEVACQUA Aria F. D D V V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
58 OLSEN Natalie J. V V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
59 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. V D D D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
60 CHIN Sophia J. D V D V D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
61 LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA D V V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
62 BAKER Audrey C. D D V V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
62 HUANG MADELINE V D D D D V V D 0.5 2 +1.5
64 MONTORIO Lily M. V D D D D V V D 1.1 2 +0.9
65 VADASZ Ibla P. D V V D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
66 JEAN Olympe G. D V V V V D D 2.2 4 +1.8
67 CHIANG Emily D V V V D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
68 LIGH Erenei J. V D D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
69 PRIEUR Lauren D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
70 ENGELMAN Madeline A. V V D V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
71 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika V V V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
72 CODY Alexandra C. D V V D V D 3.0 3 -
73 OBRADOVIC Ana V V D D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
74 LU Elaine V D V D V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
75 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. D V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
76 BARTON Mele V D D V V D D 1.2 3 +1.8
77 CALLAHAN Chase J. V V D D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
78 FANG Victoria W. V D V D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
79 ANDRES Katherine A. D V D V V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
80 CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. V D D V V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
81 HURST Kennedy D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
82 NYSTROM Sofia C. D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
83 KIM Marley I. V D D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
84 YUAN Greta D D V V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
85 BARNOVITZ Maya D D V D V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
86 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. V D D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 KONG Carys H. V D V D D D D 3.9 2 -1.9
88 LUKER Sophia D D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
89 JAVERI Amaya D D D V V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
90 DAI Olivia D D V D V D D 0.9 2 +1.1
91 KHAN Alissa V D D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
92 JOHNSON Dagny L. D V D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
93 EVANS Madelynn D V D V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
94 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. D D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
95 ENDO Miyuki N. V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
96 CHIN Elise D V D D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
97 TONG Jessie D D V D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
98 ERIKSON Kira R. D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
99 PAL Anjali G. V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
100 HOLMES Emma V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
101 BOLTON Eleksi M. D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
102 TODD Phoebe D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
103 BENOIT Adelaide L. D D D V D D 3.2 1 -2.2
103 HE Lizbeth D D D D D V 2.1 1 -1.1
105 XU ALINA D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
105 KANTIPUDI Shrika D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
107 SCHICK Veronica D D D D D V 1.5 1 -0.5
108 GOMES Diana C. D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
109 CHEN Xinyan D D D D D D 2.8 0 -2.8
110 FEARNS Zara A. D D D D D 3.0 0 -3.0
110 HU Michelle D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
112 NATH Trisha D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
113 JOHNSON Lydia D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
114 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. D D D D D D 2.4 0 -2.4
115 D'ORAZIO Sofia V. D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
116 XU Emily T. D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
117 CHANG Audrey D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
118 KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
119 HAMILTON Ciera D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
120 ELNATAN Mica A. D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.