May NAC

Div I Women's Épée

Saturday, May 8, 2021 at 1:30 PM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HURLEY Courtney L. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.5 6 +0.5
2 KETKAR Ketki V V V V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
3 HURLEY Kelley A. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
3 PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. D V V D V V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
5 NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
6 PATURU Meghana V V V V V V V V V 4.4 6 +1.6
7 KHAMIS Yasmine A. V V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
8 WASHINGTON Isis V V D V V V V V V D 5.8 5 -0.8
9 MACHULSKY Leehi V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
10 LIU Charlene (Kai) V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
11 HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. V D V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
12 GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. D V V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
13 BASSA Francesca A. V V V V V D V V D 5.8 5 -0.8
14 O'DONNELL Amanda A. V V V V V D V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
15 KUZNETSOV Victoria D V V V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
16 RUEDA Rylie V V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
17 YEU Irene V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
18 VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. V V V V V V V D 5.8 6 +0.2
19 WANG Karen V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
20 TYLER Syd V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
21 GU Sarah D V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
22 FALLON Kyle R. D V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
23 HUSISIAN Hadley N. D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
24 CEBULA Anne V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
25 BEITTEL Chloe F. D V V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
26 BATES Cassandra L. V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
27 MALDONADO Pilar I. V V V D D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
28 JOYCE Michaela V V V D D V V D 5.3 4 -1.3
29 GAJJALA Sharika R. V D V V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
30 CHIN Isabella V V V D V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
31 KETKAR Mallika V V V D V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
32 OXENREIDER Tierna A. D D V V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
33 JAKEL Sophia N. V V V V D V D 3.5 5 +1.5
34 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
35 GRADY Miriam A. V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
36 MANGANO Ariana J. V D D V V V D 4.0 4 -
37 PARK Faith K. V D V V V D D 4.8 4 -0.8
38 MAO Amy V D V V D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
39 ISERT Sarah V V V D V D D 3.1 4 +0.9
40 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. V D V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
41 KOWALSKY Rachel A. V D V V V D D 3.2 4 +0.8
42 NI Emma V D V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
43 CHU Audrey D V V V V D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
44 WATRALL Christina V V D V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
45 WU Amelia D V D D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
46 BAJAJ Nikita K. D V D D V V V D 1.2 3 +1.8
47 ZHANG Victoria R. D D V V V D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
48 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. V V V D D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
49 WEISS Talia L. D V D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
50 YAMANAKA Mina V V D D D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
51 SZEWC Alexandra V D V D D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
52 PADHYE Tanishka D V V D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
53 LUO Ashley V V D D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
54 WANG Elizabeth V D D V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
55 BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. D D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
56 TEMIRYAEV Anna M. D D D V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
57 BOYS Nishta B. V V V D D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
58 RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. D V D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
59 SCHMIDT Lori M. D D V V D V D 2.0 2 -
60 MCLANE Lauren V D D D V D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
61 LEUNG Natalie D D D V V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
62 GANDHI Sedna S. D D V D D V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
63 CHOI Eunice D D D V V D V D 2.0 2 -
63 MING Cynthia V V D D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
65 LIU Christina A. D V V V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
66 PAPADAKIS Lily D V D V D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
67 ZAFFT Tatiana M. V D V D V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
68 RUNIONS Emersyn D D V V V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
69 KIM Erika S. V V D V D D D 1.6 3 +1.4
70 NELSON-LOVE Lily B. V V D D V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
71 LIN Katie Y. V D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
72 JAMES Josephine V D D D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
73 MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. D D V D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
74 MEHROTRA Anya D V D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
75 GAO Judy D D D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
76 SAAL Anna D V V D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
77 LEE Michelle J. D D D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
78 SMUK Daria A. D V V D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
78 KIM Elizabeth Y. D V D D V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
80 DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia V V D D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
81 LAWSON Marie A. V D D V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
81 CAPELLUA Mariasole D D D V V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
83 MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) D V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
83 HENRY Asha S. V D D D V D D 2.0 2 -
85 REID Anousheh D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
86 TONCHEVA Victoria M. V D D D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
87 ZUHARS Renee A. D V V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
88 FELAND Alexandra V D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
89 CHAN Elizabeth D D V V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
90 SEBASTIAN Felicity A. D D D V D V 3.0 2 -1.0
91 GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. V D D V D D 0.6 2 +1.4
92 KIM Zoe L. D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
93 RASMUSSEN Ashelee V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
94 ASHER Valerie D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
95 DOUGLAS Julia F. D D V D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
96 WANG Nora D D D D D V 2.6 1 -1.6
96 CHAN Cheri K. D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
98 AHUJA Arianna D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
99 JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
100 SWEET Ryleigh E. V D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
100 EBRAHIM Ameera H. D V D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
102 BOWIE Charlotta V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
103 LEANG Andrea K. V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
104 DARANOUVONG Logan D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
105 CAREY Michele S. D D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
106 ZHANG Tina Tianyi D D D D V D 2.8 1 -1.8
106 WEBER Nora D D D D D V 2.3 1 -1.3
108 DESAI Meera P. D D D D D V 2.0 1 -1.0
109 GUMAGAY Erika L. D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
110 MILLER Veronica D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
111 FILIPPOV Nika D. D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
112 DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
113 LEANG Priscilla Y. D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
114 SMITH Grace L. D D D D D D 2.4 0 -2.4
115 PROKOP Jeannine A. D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
116 HESS Heidi J. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.