May NAC

Div I Women's Foil

Saturday, May 8, 2021 at 2:00 PM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DUBROVICH Jacqueline 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 77%
2 WEINTRAUB Maia M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 74%
3 ROSS Nicole 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 84%
3 SCRUGGS Lauren S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 73%
5 TAFFEL sara 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 45%
6 KOO Haley B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 40%
7 MARINELLI Ever 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 34%
8 CHENG Evelyn 100% 100% 100% 97% 86% 56% 18%
9 PARTRIDGE Morgan K. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 38%
9 YAROSHENKO Karina 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 19%
11 TAN Helen 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 48%
12 DESCHNER Stefani K. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
13 LUNG Katerina 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 22% 3%
14 LEE Alina 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 39% 8%
15 LEE Allison (Allie) 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 34% 2%
16 JING Emily 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 4%
17 CHO Sabrina N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 36%
17 RHODES Zander 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 47%
19 BINDER Sylvie A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 76%
20 MINARIK Natalie M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 26%
21 ZHENG Ivy 100% 100% 98% 87% 61% 27% 5%
22 CHUSID Mikayla 100% 99% 93% 70% 33% 8% 1%
23 HE Elizabeth W. 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 11%
24 APELIAN Katherine 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 12% 1%
25 TIEU May L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39%
25 CAO Arianna L. 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 16% 2%
27 HOOSHI Erica S. 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 22% 2%
28 KIM Rachael 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 20% 3%
29 SERBAN Samantha M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 5%
30 KONG Chin-Yi 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4% -
31 CHUSID Renata M. 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 12%
32 DAVIA Daniella V. 100% 98% 86% 55% 22% 4% -
33 JING Alexandra 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 13%
34 LI Phoebe J. 100% 96% 73% 34% 7% 1%
35 KONG Olivia 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% -
36 LAM Justina 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 17%
37 EYER Hailey M. 100% 98% 83% 51% 19% 3% -
38 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 14%
39 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" 100% 97% 82% 48% 17% 3% -
39 LOCKE Savannah 100% 96% 78% 43% 13% 2% -
41 CHEN Allison V. 100% 95% 73% 38% 11% 1% -
42 NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 10%
43 CHEN Jia P. 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 9% -
44 MASSICK Laine 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 15% 1%
45 STAMOS Maria 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 20%
46 LEE Paulina 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 9% 1%
47 YU Lauren C. 100% 63% 22% 4% - - -
48 KOO Rachel A. 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 8%
49 LESLIE Ryanne T. 100% 100% 98% 89% 64% 28% 5%
50 KNIGHT Skylar 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 18% 3%
51 LI Rachel Y. 100% 96% 75% 38% 10% 1% -
52 BREKER Anika 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 23% 3%
53 JO Mia C. 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 16% 1%
53 CHOI Lenna K. 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 33% 3%
55 PARK Rowan M. 100% 99% 94% 73% 40% 12% 2%
56 SHEN Sophia H. 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 15% 1%
57 KIM Katherine 100% 95% 71% 33% 9% 1% -
58 XU Christine 100% 91% 60% 24% 5% 1% -
59 LI Grace Q. 100% 98% 85% 49% 14% 1%
60 GRIFFIN Emma G. 100% 98% 83% 48% 14% 1%
61 GONG Christina S. 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 11% 1%
62 QIAN Crystal 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 28% 4%
63 ZHENG Vivian 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 30% 5%
64 CASTANEDA Erika L. 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 11% 1%
65 HALL Velma 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 14% 1%
66 LEE Brianna J. 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 9% 1%
67 YHIP Mikaela M. 100% 96% 76% 41% 13% 2% -
68 SARTORI Taylor M. 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2% -
69 KOKES Gabrielle 100% 99% 88% 62% 28% 6% 1%
70 PEVZNER Victoria 100% 98% 85% 50% 15% 1%
71 MILLER Naomi E. 100% 95% 73% 37% 11% 1% -
72 FREEDMAN Miranda W. 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 15% 1%
73 GUERRA Sofia E. 100% 97% 77% 41% 12% 2% -
74 SHAW Kayla M. 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1% -
75 HO Brianna W. 100% 99% 92% 71% 38% 12% 1%
76 WANG Ellen 100% 99% 94% 73% 39% 12% 1%
77 LI Meilin 100% 96% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
78 FERRARI Christina M. 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 41% 10%
79 PERLMAN Talia 100% 84% 46% 15% 2% - -
80 SENIC Adeline 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 12% 1%
81 CEPERO Rosabel 100% 95% 72% 38% 11% 2% -
82 KHOO Lauren A. 100% 97% 80% 46% 17% 3% -
83 DUAN Konnie 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1% -
84 LEE Bethany W. 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% -
85 JANG Kimberley 100% 89% 53% 17% 2% -
86 OUYANG Bridgette Z. 100% 96% 77% 40% 11% 1% -
87 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
88 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa 100% 98% 82% 50% 19% 4% -
89 DEBACK Greta I. 100% 91% 61% 26% 6% 1% -
90 ADAMS KIM Natalie 100% 95% 70% 30% 7% 1% -
90 WEINTRAUB Io H. 100% 77% 33% 7% 1% - -
92 CHO Cameron S. 100% 79% 40% 11% 2% - -
93 PAHLAVI Dahlia 100% 86% 51% 17% 3% - -
94 KLINE Melissa C. 100% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1% -
95 XUE Alanna L. 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1% -
96 SOOD Ishani S. 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5% -
97 CHO Taylor S. 100% 76% 31% 6% 1% -
98 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) 100% 94% 67% 30% 6% -
99 KOENIG Charlotte R. 100% 95% 76% 42% 15% 3% -
99 TALWALKAR Apoorva 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
101 HUANG NATALIE 100% 77% 34% 7% 1% - -
102 HUNG Juliana K. 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 19% 2%
102 YU Seneca 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1% -
104 SHEN Lydia 100% 88% 53% 19% 4% - -
105 DE LA CRUZ Eden 100% 85% 50% 17% 3% - -
106 CHO Gracie L. 100% 92% 65% 31% 9% 1% -
107 YE Eileen 100% 88% 55% 22% 5% 1% -
108 ZHAO Sophie L. 100% 89% 56% 22% 5% 1% -
108 SHIH Diane 100% 93% 64% 27% 6% 1% -
110 RENTON Samantha 100% 81% 43% 13% 2% - -
111 KOROL Dana 100% 80% 41% 12% 2% - -
112 FERNANDES Thea 100% 89% 56% 20% 4% - -
113 SUN Chien-Yu 100% 78% 38% 11% 2% - -
114 SEAL Julie T. 100% 94% 68% 30% 6% -
115 OH Erin H. 100% 91% 62% 27% 7% 1% -
115 HECKMANN Emma 100% 97% 81% 47% 16% 3% -
117 COSTELLO Angeline S. 100% 69% 25% 5% - -
118 PROCOPIO Lucia 100% 76% 32% 7% 1% -
119 KOROL Neta 100% 88% 56% 21% 4% - -
120 GU EMILY 100% 67% 24% 5% - - -
121 DRAGNE Alexis D. 100% 57% 17% 3% - - -
122 FERGUSON Diane F. 100% 74% 33% 8% 1% - -
123 ZHAO Aileen Y. 100% 76% 35% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.