Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DUBROVICH Jacqueline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
2 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
3 | ROSS Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
3 | SCRUGGS Lauren S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
5 | TAFFEL sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
6 | KOO Haley B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
7 | MARINELLI Ever | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
8 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
9 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
9 | YAROSHENKO Karina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 19% |
11 | TAN Helen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
12 | DESCHNER Stefani K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
13 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
14 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
15 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 2% |
16 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
17 | CHO Sabrina N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
17 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
19 | BINDER Sylvie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% |
20 | MINARIK Natalie M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
21 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
22 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
23 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 11% | |
24 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
25 | TIEU May L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
25 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
27 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 22% | 2% |
28 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
29 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
30 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
31 | CHUSID Renata M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 12% | |
32 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
33 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
34 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
35 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
36 | LAM Justina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 17% |
37 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
38 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
39 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
39 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
41 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
42 | NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% |
43 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | - |
44 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
45 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% | |
46 | LEE Paulina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
47 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
48 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 8% |
49 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
50 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
51 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
52 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
53 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
53 | CHOI Lenna K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 3% |
55 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
56 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
57 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
58 | XU Christine | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
59 | LI Grace Q. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
60 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
61 | GONG Christina S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
62 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
63 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
64 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
65 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
66 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
67 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
68 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
69 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
70 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
71 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
72 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
73 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
74 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
75 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
76 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
77 | LI Meilin | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
78 | FERRARI Christina M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
79 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
80 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
81 | CEPERO Rosabel | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
82 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
83 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
84 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
85 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
86 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
87 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
88 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
89 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
90 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
90 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
92 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
93 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
94 | KLINE Melissa C. | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
95 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
96 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
97 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
98 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - | |
99 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
99 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
101 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
102 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
102 | YU Seneca | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
104 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
105 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
106 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
107 | YE Eileen | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
108 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
108 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
110 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
111 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
112 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
113 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
114 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
115 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
115 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
117 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
118 | PROCOPIO Lucia | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
119 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
120 | GU EMILY | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
121 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
122 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
123 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.