Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCRUGGS Lauren S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 2 | TAN Helen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 3 | MARINELLI Ever | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | |
| 3 | CHO Sabrina N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 5 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 6 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 4% |
| 7 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 8 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 9 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 10 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 11 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
| 12 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% | 6% |
| 13 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
| 14 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 45% | 8% |
| 15 | CHOI Lenna K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
| 16 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 10% | |
| 17 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 18 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 19 | CHUSID Renata M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 20 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% | |
| 21 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 22 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 19% |
| 23 | FERRARI Christina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 24 | YAROSHENKO Karina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% |
| 25 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 26 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
| 28 | KOO Haley B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 29 | NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 30 | LI Grace Q. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 31 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 32 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 1% |
| 33 | LEE Paulina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 26% | 2% | |
| 34 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 35 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 35 | KLINE Melissa C. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 37 | LAM Justina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 38 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
| 39 | GONG Christina S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 40 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 42 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 43 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 44 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 45 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 46 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 3% |
| 47 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 48 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 49 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 50 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | |
| 51 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 52 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 98% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 4% |
| 54 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 55 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 56 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 57 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 1% |
| 58 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 59 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 62 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | |
| 63 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 2% |
| 64 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 65 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 66 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 67 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 68 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 69 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 70 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 71 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 72 | BOLES Sophia | 100% | 97% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 74 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 75 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 76 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
| 76 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 37% | 6% | - | |
| 78 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 97% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 79 | YU Seneca | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 79 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 81 | YIN Helen | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 82 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 83 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 84 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 96% | 60% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 87 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 88 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 89 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 90 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 92 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 93 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 94 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 95 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 96 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 97 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 98 | BOODELL Ella | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 98 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 100 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 101 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 102 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 103 | YE Eileen | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 104 | CEPERO Rosabel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 104 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 106 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 88% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 85% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 108 | QIAN Zhiyan | 100% | 66% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 109 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 110 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 100% | 93% | 37% | 5% | - | - | |
| 111 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 111 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 111 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 114 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 115 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 116 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 42% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 117 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 118 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 119 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | STONE Madelyn L. | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.