May NAC

Junior Women's Saber

Sunday, May 9, 2021 at 1:30 PM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. V D V V V D V V V V V V V 4.9 4 -0.9
2 GREENBAUM Atara R. V V V D V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
3 AVAKIAN Mikaela V V D V V V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
3 KIM Zoe D V D V V V V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
5 LU Vivian Y. V V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
6 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
7 JOHNSON Honor B. V D V V V V V V V D 5.8 5 -0.8
8 TZOU Alexandra V V D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
9 PAK Kaitlyn V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
10 POSSICK Lola P. V V D V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
11 SHOMAN Jenna V V V D V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
12 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V V D V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
13 GOUHIN Chloe D V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
14 HARRISON Imogen N. V V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
15 YUN Joy D V D V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
16 VADASZ Ibla P. V V V D V D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
17 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
18 CHIN Erika J. V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
19 ZEGERS Anneke E. V D V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
19 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V V D V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
21 MILLER Sky V V V V V D V D 5.4 5 -0.4
22 KONG Vera V V V V V D V D 5.3 5 -0.3
23 CHIOLDI Mina D V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
24 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
25 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. V D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
26 LEE Alexandra B. D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
27 SATHYANATH Kailing D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
28 FREEDMAN Janna N. V D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
29 LI Amanda C. V D V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
30 MARSEE Samantha V D V V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
31 JOHNSON Lauren D V V V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
32 BLUM Leah I. V D D D D V V V D 3.9 2 -1.9
33 OISHI Megumi D V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
34 CODY Alexandra C. V V V D V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
35 JULIEN Michelle V V V D V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
36 HILD Nisha V D V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
37 SZETO Chloe D V V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
37 ENDO Miyuki N. V V V V D D 1.9 4 +2.1
39 CHANG Josephine S. D V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
40 TONG Kunling D V D V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
41 KALRA Himani V. V V V V D D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
42 GREENBAUM Ella K. V V V D V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
43 BUHAY Rachel T. V D V V V D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
43 TIMOFEYEV Nicole D V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
45 OLSEN Natalie J. V D V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
46 NI Sharon V V D V V D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
47 FEARNS Zara A. V V V D D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
48 LIANG Megan V V D D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
49 SHEALY Maggie V D V V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
50 MOZHAEVA MARIA V V D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
51 BALAKUMARAN Maya D V V D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
52 ANDRES Katherine A. V D D V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
53 ANDRES Charmaine G. D D D V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
54 CARVALHO Isabela A. V D D V V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
55 XI Shining D V V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
56 BOIS Adele V V D V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
57 MIKA Veronica V V D D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
58 TAO Hannah J. V D V D D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
59 LUKASHENKO Angelina D D V D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
60 YONG Erika E. D V D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
61 DARINGA Arianna D V V D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
62 KATZ Anat D V V D D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
63 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. V D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
64 LEVITIS Danielle D V D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
65 MATAIEV Natalie S. V V D D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
66 GORMLEY Arwen E. V V V V D D D 4.0 4 -
67 TODD Phoebe V V D D V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
68 STONE Hava S. V V D V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
69 NEIBART Fiona V V D D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
70 NEWELL Alexia C. D D D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
71 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn D V V D V D D 3.7 3 -0.7
72 GHAYALOD reya V D D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
73 SHOMAN Miriam D D V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
74 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. V D D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
75 BARTON Mele D D V V V D D 0.7 3 +2.3
76 CALLAHAN Chase J. D V V D V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
77 DANK Dina D V D V V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
78 CAO Stephanie X. D D D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
79 GORMAN Victoria M. V D D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
80 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. V D V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
81 PAUL Lila D V V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
82 WU Erica L. D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
83 LACSON Sarah D D V D D V D 4.1 2 -2.1
84 PRIEUR Lauren D V D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
85 FANG Victoria W. V D D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
86 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. V D V D D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
87 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea D D D D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
88 HUANG MADELINE D D V D D V D 0.2 2 +1.8
89 LIGH Erenei J. D D V D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
90 HOLMES Emma D D D V V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
91 JAVERI Amaya D D V V D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
92 BEVACQUA Aria F. D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
93 ERIKSON Kira R. D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
94 BAKER Audrey C. D D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
95 GUTHIKONDA Nithya V D D D D D 3.6 1 -2.6
96 DEPEW Charlotte R. D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
97 NOVICK Mia J. D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
98 SHIN Andrea Y. D V D D D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
98 LIAO Siwen V D D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
100 GRAFF Sophie V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
101 TONG Jessie D V D D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
102 CHIN Sophia J. D V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
103 CHIANG Emily D D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
104 CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
105 DILLE Carolina G. D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
106 EVANS Madelynn D D V D D D 0.5 1 +0.5
107 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
108 CHANG Audrey V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
109 WANG Jianning D D D D D V 1.5 1 -0.5
110 ELNATAN Mica A. D D D V D D 0.4 1 +0.6
111 WIGGERS Susan Q. D D D D D 2.6 0 -2.6
112 JEAN Olympe G. D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
113 KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
114 LU Amy D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
115 SCHIKORE Anna M. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
116 LIGH Karis D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
117 D'ORAZIO Sofia V. D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
118 MEYTIN Sophia E. D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
119 NATH Trisha D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
120 RODGERS Rachel D D D D D D 0.0 0 -

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.