Meadowlands Exposition Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Sophie | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 4% |
| 2 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% | |
| 3 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 54% |
| 5 | GRAFF Sophie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 6 | GHAYALOD Reya | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% |
| 7 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 8 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 9 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
| 10 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 11 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 50% | 25% |
| 12 | TSUI Natalie | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | SHI Cathleen | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 14 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 13% |
| 16 | ALTIRS Kate | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 17 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 18 | JEONG Katie | - | 1% | 17% | 45% | 31% | 6% | |
| 19 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 20 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 35% | |
| 21 | LU Elaine | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
| 22 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 24 | LAGOON Miriam | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 35% | 7% |
| 27 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% | |
| 28 | SPEARS Mya B | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 29 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 30 | REN Xinling | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | SENOGLU Irmak | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | DAI Olivia | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | SO Catelyn | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | |
| 34 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 35 | FESTA Carina | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 36 | WEI Vivian W. | - | - | 4% | 26% | 47% | 23% | |
| 37 | XU Alina | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | HUANG Rachael | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 39 | BAWA Anahat | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 40 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | MCKEE Brynnley | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 42 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 2% | 18% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | MAKLIN Sofia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 44 | ZHENG Valentina | 10% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | NAYAK Esha | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 46 | NAYAK Anika | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 48 | DONG Angel | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | FEIG Sela | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 50 | DEHON Inès | 2% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 51 | CHOU Amy R. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LIU Yifei | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 53 | STRIZHEVSKY Ariel | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | WEI JoyAnn | 2% | 19% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 56 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | ZENG Sarah | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | CHIANG Melissa | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CHEN Ziyi | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | YEN Natalie | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | JAVERI Amaya | 8% | 27% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | ATTIA Jasmine | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | ZHANG Emily | 40% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 66 | XU Emily T. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 67 | CHAVAN Arya | 42% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | CANSECO Carly | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 70 | CHO-SAYEGH Emily | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 71 | TAL Josette | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 72 | THOMAS Rhiana | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | JANG Nayoung | 31% | 51% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 74 | NEELAM Saanvi | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.