The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC

Cadet Men's Saber

Monday, May 31, 2021 at 12:00 PM

Meadowlands Exposition Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HAN Daniel Y. 100% 99% 93% 72% 35% 7%
2 WILSON Jude 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 43%
3 SIMAK Joseph P. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 17%
3 HO Kaden M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 15%
5 HONG Vincent Q. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 15%
6 PENG Bryan 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 5%
7 KIM Shaun M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 32%
8 BABAYEV Gabriel A. 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 24%
9 LILOV Neil 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 70%
10 DENG Andrew 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 18%
11 GHAYALOD Ansh 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 9%
12 OVERDECK Andrew 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 47% 11%
13 FENG Leo 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 23%
14 BREKHMAN Eric 100% 95% 73% 37% 10% 1%
15 HUANG Ethan F. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 20%
16 CHEN Evan P. 100% 94% 70% 33% 8% 1%
17 GEORGE Daniel 100% 100% 97% 80% 38% 9% 1%
18 ZENG Noah 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 32% 6%
19 STURN Oliver 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 11% 1%
20 CHENG Kyle 100% 94% 73% 40% 13% 2% -
21 PANDEY Neil 100% 97% 81% 47% 17% 3% -
22 HUANG Tyler T. 100% 100% 95% 76% 43% 14% 2%
23 DEPEW Spencer 100% 99% 85% 48% 13% 1% -
24 SANDERS Samuel B. 100% 99% 86% 53% 19% 3%
25 TRUDNOS Allen 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 4%
26 FLOT Tai A. 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 41% 10%
27 SHOMAN Zachary 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 12%
28 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. 100% 100% 100% 98% 90% 64% 24%
29 SHOMAN Noah 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 11% 1%
30 MATSUI Alen K. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 37% 4%
31 ZHENG Edward L. 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4%
32 GOLD Jackson 100% 93% 66% 30% 7% 1%
33 WU Mengke 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 15%
34 BROU Inkosi 100% 99% 88% 61% 27% 6% 1%
35 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 99% 91% 67% 33% 9% 1%
36 PERRON Robert 100% 90% 59% 24% 5% 1% -
37 WU Wilmund 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 16% 2%
38 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 18%
39 MARGULIES William 100% 98% 84% 52% 19% 3%
40 SHTEYN Mark 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 6%
41 HU Andrew 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 5%
42 FLITSANOV Macabee 100% 94% 69% 32% 8% 1% -
43 JANG Junhyuk 100% 99% 90% 64% 30% 8% 1%
44 TANG Charles 100% 90% 52% 16% 2% - -
45 FIELDS Matthew S. 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 17% 3%
46 VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil 100% 97% 82% 50% 19% 4% -
47 GOLD Carter 100% 93% 62% 20% 3% - -
48 OH Triton 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
49 KIM Matthew 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
50 YUAN Kevin 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 4%
51 MICLAUS Justin 100% 100% 93% 68% 30% 5%
52 BAE Jason I. 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 10%
53 POSY Daniel 100% 79% 39% 11% 2% -
54 UH Daniel 100% 92% 60% 23% 4% -
55 WANG Nicolas 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 11%
56 DA GRACA Aidan 100% 96% 77% 45% 17% 3% -
57 ENGEL Peter 100% 88% 56% 22% 5% - -
58 ROBERTS Justin C. 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 43% 11%
59 KUSHKOV Veniamin 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 34% 4%
60 CHENG Cody 100% 75% 34% 9% 1% -
61 EPSTEIN Oliver D. 100% 92% 63% 27% 6% 1% -
62 SMINK Oliver 100% 98% 85% 55% 23% 5% -
63 WAGNER Calvin 100% 82% 37% 7% 1% - -
64 MOULTON Ian 100% 69% 28% 7% 1% - -
65 CHOI Silas 100% 99% 90% 67% 33% 10% 1%
66 WEBER Mattias A. 100% 98% 83% 46% 12% 1% -
67 MCCARTHY Gabriel 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2%
68 ANAND Sahil Z. 100% 92% 62% 24% 5% - -
69 ALTIRS Giorgio 100% 88% 55% 21% 5% 1% -
70 KOGAN Nikita 100% 91% 65% 31% 9% 1% -
71 STERN Tobias 100% 68% 25% 5% - - -
72 LEONARD Charles 100% 97% 79% 45% 15% 3% -
73 FREDRICK Jameer 100% 91% 62% 26% 6% 1% -
74 HUANG Maxwell H. 100% 99% 91% 63% 27% 6% -
75 WANG Oscar 100% 71% 30% 7% 1% -
76 HUROWITZ Max 100% 78% 38% 11% 2% - -
77 CHEN Alex 100% 52% 13% 2% - -
78 ARMOUR Malachi 100% 50% 10% 1% - - -
79 BODKIN Jake M. 100% 79% 40% 11% 2% - -
80 GUTTENPLAN Yann 100% 63% 19% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.