San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
| 2 | CHEN Ziyuan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 3 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 3 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 5 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 4% |
| 6 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 7 | PATINO Yahir | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 8 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 9 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 10 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | HSIUNG Richie | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 12 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 13 | DIERKS Kian | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | WOO Christian | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 15 | ZHENG zhe | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | LIM Charles Q. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | GOBBO Alexander | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 18 | KIM BANSEOK | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 19 | WANG Andrew | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | OH Jaden | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 21 | NGUYEN Liam | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.