San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 78% |
| 2 | MARSEE Samantha | - | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% |
| 3 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 13% |
| 3 | JUNG Irene | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 6 | KER Grace | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 65% | 13% |
| 7 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 8 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 2% | - |
| 9 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% |
| 10 | YONG Erika E. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 11 | BARTON Mele | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 12 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 13 | HUANG MADELINE | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 14 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 15 | LIN Lauren | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | CHIN Elise | 1% | 13% | 51% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 17 | LIN Grace | 33% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 18 | MEHTA Anousha | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | JIANG MIchelle | 1% | 10% | 40% | 38% | 11% | - | - |
| 20 | CHEN Athena | 47% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 21 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.