Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | V V D V V | V V V V V | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 2 | BIASCO Anna | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | TALAVERA Daena | D V D V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 5 | FILBY Sarah M. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 6 | SENIC Adeline | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | MOON Elina C. | D V V V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 8 | LUO ZIWEN | V D V D D | V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 9 | LEE Yejine | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | SUN Ruoxi | V V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 11 | ZHAO Sophie L. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 12 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | V V D V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | KOSTELNY Alexis | V V D V D D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | PARK Rowan M. | D V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | LEE Brianna J. | V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | CHEN Alyssa J. | V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | DEBACK Greta I. | V V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 20 | JIA Amy | D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | SLADE Mycah R. | V V V D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 22 | TAN Clarisse | V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 23 | SARTORI Taylor M. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 24 | GUERRA Sofia E. | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 26 | SHALANSKY Julia B. | D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 27 | KLINE Melissa C. | V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 28 | CHEN Jessie S. | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 29 | TONG Ophelia | V D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 30 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | UPTON Elizabeth | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 32 | ZHANG Rongrui | D D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 33 | CROMPTON Celia N. | D D D V V V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 34 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 35 | DU Hannah | D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 36 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 37 | BANIN Isabelle J. | D V D D D V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 38 | WEBB Ella | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 39 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 40 | MAO Rebecca J. | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 40 | BIODROWICZ Julia | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 42 | ZHENG yuqi | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 43 | EUH Jayme | D D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 44 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 45 | WATERS Samantha M. | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 45 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 47 | PARK Leah | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 48 | HUMBERT Heather | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 49 | KELLEY Sophia | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 49 | FISHER Racheal | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.