Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 2 | AHUJA Arianna | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 3 | TYLER Syd | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 73% |
| 3 | LIPTHAY Hanna | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 5 | MYLER AnneMarie | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 35% | |
| 6 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 7 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% |
| 8 | BOLES Savvianna | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
| 9 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 45% | 17% |
| 10 | HONG Elaine | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% |
| 11 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 2% |
| 12 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | - | 3% | 23% | 48% | 26% | |
| 14 | ANDERSON Nora E. | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 35% | 5% |
| 15 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% |
| 16 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 1% | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | |
| 17 | MIINEA Elena | 2% | 16% | 41% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 18 | KIZILBASH Zara | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHU-HILL Alice A. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | CHUANG Ramona | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 21 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 5% | 45% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | MACEY Hadley | 21% | 53% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | NELSON Grace E. | 22% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | XIONG Angelica | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 25 | CARLSON Ava | 54% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 26 | MCKENNA Analise | 38% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | O’BRYAN Riley | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 28 | CHAFEE Nina | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 29 | SANTOS Cara | 25% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.