Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHOU Kevin | - | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 61% |
2 | TONG ZACHARY | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
3 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
3 | WOODWARD Connor | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
5 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 46% | 20% |
6 | HONG Steven | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
7 | FENG Leo | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
8 | CHAVES Matthew J. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
9 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
10 | WANG Andrew | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
11 | FORT David | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
12 | GHENEA George Philipe | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
13 | ETIN Ari | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
14 | JOHNSTON Bennett S. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
15 | GALLAGHER Brett | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | WELLS Griffin | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
17 | LEE Aydan J. | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
18 | REN Richard | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
19 | COX Luis E. | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
20 | BAERMAN Michael | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
21 | GAUVEY Kieran | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
22 | OLIVER Isaac | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
23 | THRONE Ayden | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
25 | GAO Andrew | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
26 | BAGHERI Shaheen | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | FRUTH Evan | 11% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
27 | JENKINS Jack | 12% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.