King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 65% |
| 2 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% | |
| 3 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 5 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
| 6 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 7 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 8 | CHANG Leo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 9 | HAPP Braeden | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 10 | TANG Shu Hon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 11 | KUMAR Arjun | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 13 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 14 | DEELY Hartigan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 15 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 16 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
| 17 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 18 | OH Aster | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 19 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 22% | 3% | |
| 23 | MARGULIAN Grant | 100% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | KLAUBER Raphael | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | STRYCHARZ Walker | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.