King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 63% |
2 | ROY Layla | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% | |
3 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
3 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
5 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
6 | SU Michelle | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 49% | 13% |
7 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
8 | CHEN Renee | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
9 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
10 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
11 | ZHOU Catherine | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
12 | MI Aileen | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 7% |
13 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
14 | PAULUS Isabella | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
15 | LEVY Avery | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
16 | BENNETT Abigail | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
17 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
18 | SHIM Grace | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | - |
20 | WEI Angela | 5% | 30% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
21 | PAULUS Sloane | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
22 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 13% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
23 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
24 | JHAVERI Sanjana | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
25 | HIMMEL Alexandra | 20% | 44% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
26 | SHI Sasha | 38% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
27 | SHTROM Uma A. | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.