America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
2 | CHOI Silas | D V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
3 | SHOMAN Noah | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
5 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | KIM Shaun M. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | HOLZ Daniel | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
8 | PATIL Aaryan A. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
9 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
10 | BAE Jason I. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
11 | WANG Nicolas | V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
12 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
13 | LIM William J. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
14 | OH Triton | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
15 | WANG Robert | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
16 | KWALWASSER Eric | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
17 | KILARI Krish | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
18 | ZHANG Ethan W. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
19 | PENG Bryan | D V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
20 | YANG Dylan | V V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
21 | ZENG Noah | V V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
22 | QIU Nathan | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
23 | REN James | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
24 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | LIN Daniel | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
26 | TAO Jeffrey | V V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
27 | KANG Evan | V V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
28 | HU Christopher | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
28 | KROON Lucas | V V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
30 | LIU Lawrence | V D D V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
31 | SU Landon | V D V D D V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
32 | ZHENG Edward L. | D V D D V | V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
33 | HOTHA Nikhil | V D V V V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
34 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
35 | CHEONG Heonjun | V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
36 | GAO Albert | D V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
37 | RAMANAN Govind | D V V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
38 | GUFFEY Christopher | V D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
39 | TURCK Caspar J. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
39 | SUGIURA Samuel | V D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
41 | BOSITA Carson | D V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
42 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
43 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | D D V V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
44 | PATEL Rayn | V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
45 | IDRISSI Idris | D V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
46 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | V V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
47 | ZHOU James Y. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
47 | MICLAUS Justin | V V D D V D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
49 | KANG evan | V D D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
50 | GUAN Dennis | V D D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
51 | NGUYEN Anthony | D V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
52 | CHEEMA Hyder | V V D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
53 | BROU Inkosi | V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
53 | JORGESON Charlie | V D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
55 | HRISTOV Kris | V D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
56 | CHEN Lohen | V V D D D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
56 | WANG daniel | D V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
58 | CHOW William T. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
59 | ANAND Rohan | D D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
60 | KUMAR Sachit | D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
61 | LI Yiwei | D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
62 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | D D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
63 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | D V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
64 | FANG Eason | D D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
65 | WU Richard | V V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
66 | HUANG Maxwell H. | D D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
67 | EYBELMAN Ariel | D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
68 | KUSHKOV Daniel | V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
69 | LIN Steve | D D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
70 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | V D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
71 | HERNANDEZ Stanton | D V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
72 | KERCHER Alexander | D V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
73 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | D D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
74 | HOLZ Lucas | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
75 | DAI Gary | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
76 | GUREVICH Benjamin | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
77 | KALPATHY Rohit | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
78 | GUREVICH Savely | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
79 | LEVY Jacob | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
80 | OLARIO Raphael | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
81 | HERRERA aragon | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
81 | NG Jonathan | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
83 | PRIEUR Christian F. | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
84 | KATZ Ryan | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
85 | HUNG Samuel | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
86 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
87 | WILKERSON Jude | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
88 | LIGH Checed | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
89 | ANAND Sahil Z. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
90 | LAM Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
91 | LIN Philip T. | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
92 | WANG HongXi | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
93 | POLEYUMPTEWA Connor | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.