America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
2 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
3 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
5 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
6 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
7 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
8 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
9 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 16% |
10 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
11 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
12 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
13 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 9% |
14 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
15 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
16 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
17 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
18 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
19 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 19% |
20 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
21 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
22 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
23 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
24 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
25 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
26 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 41% |
26 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 17% |
28 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
29 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
30 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
31 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
32 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
33 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
34 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
35 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
36 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 8% |
36 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
38 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
39 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
40 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
41 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
42 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
43 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
44 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
45 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
46 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - | |
47 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
48 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
49 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
50 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
51 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
52 | YANG Lea | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
54 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
54 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
56 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
57 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
58 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 1% | |
59 | LU Elaine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
60 | XIAO julie | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
61 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | 2% |
62 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
63 | PENG Florella | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
64 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
65 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
66 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
67 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
68 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
69 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
70 | WU Helen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
71 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
72 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
73 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
74 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
76 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
77 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
78 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
79 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
80 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - |
81 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
82 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
83 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
84 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
85 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
86 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
86 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
86 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
89 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 96% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
89 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
89 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
92 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
93 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
94 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
95 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
96 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
97 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
98 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
99 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
100 | HU Michelle | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
101 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
101 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
103 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
104 | SPRINGER Ella | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
105 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
106 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
107 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 97% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
108 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
109 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
110 | DONG Angel | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
111 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
112 | PAL Anjali G. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
113 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
114 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
115 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
115 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
117 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
118 | NICHOLAS Eva | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
118 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
120 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
121 | KOKAL Genevieve | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
122 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
123 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 92% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.