America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
| 2 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 21% |
| 3 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 6% |
| 3 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 5 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 6 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 7 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 8 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 9 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 10 | FENG ge | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 11 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
| 12 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 13 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 14 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% | |
| 15 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 16 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | |
| 17 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% | |
| 18 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 19 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 21 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 26 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 27 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 28 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 30 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 31 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 33 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 34 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 35 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 17% |
| 35 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | SENYUVA Su | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 38 | PARK Judy | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 39 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 40 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 43 | YOU Emily | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
| 44 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 45 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 4% |
| 47 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 48 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 50 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 51 | LEE Rachel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 52 | HAYNES Antonia | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 53 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | QI Jarynne Valerie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 55 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 56 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 57 | BARCLAY Khyri | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 57 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 59 | CHOI Grace | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 60 | JOSHI Aanika | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 61 | DAHER Yasmine | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 63 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 66 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 67 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 68 | FAN Elizabeth | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | |
| 69 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 70 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 71 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 72 | GEVA Eliana | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 73 | NIX Reagan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | MIRZA Annoshae | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | XU Bonnie Jia Li | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 75 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 77 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 78 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 79 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 81 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | LIU Baihan | 100% | 87% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | SYKES Elynor | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 85 | IYER Ishana | 100% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | FREEMAN Kate | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 87 | MCKENNA Analise | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 88 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | PETROFF Gabrielle | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.