Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
2 | SONG Angela | - | 4% | 24% | 44% | 26% | 2% |
3 | LONADIER Keira | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
3 | FENG ge | - | 2% | 19% | 46% | 33% | |
5 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 27% | 2% |
6 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% |
7 | YU Nicole J. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
8 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 4% | 30% | 46% | 19% | |
9 | SHU Youshan | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
10 | AZMEH nour | - | 7% | 37% | 43% | 13% | |
11 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
12 | BENZAN India | - | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
13 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
14 | HOPKINS Leila | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 16% |
15 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 6% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
16 | ZHENG Linden | 2% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 5% | - |
17 | GUJJA Misha | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 41% | 11% |
18 | LIN Elaine | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
19 | LI Fei | 3% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - |
20 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | - | 9% | 37% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
21 | SOTELO Michelle | 14% | 58% | 24% | 3% | - | |
22 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | |
23 | SONG Jaeyi | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
24 | SOMOL Emma | 37% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
25 | HUANG Ziyan | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
26 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 18% | 52% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
27 | DAGLI Saira Veronica | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
28 | TIBBETTS Lily | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
29 | SHEAHAN Emma | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.