Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SO Hananiah | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
2 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 88% |
3 | RAI Avin | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
3 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
5 | NOBLE Colin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
6 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
7 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
8 | LO Alexander | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
9 | FLOT Tai A. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | |
10 | KILGALLEN William | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
11 | MORALES Jonathan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
12 | DOLAN Charles R. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 2% |
13 | ZHUANG Rayken | 9% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
14 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 2% |
15 | WEHLE Paul | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
16 | WANG Andy | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
17 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
18 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
19 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
20 | ENGEL Peter | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
21 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 4% |
22 | PIWOWAR Alex | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
23 | EDELMAN Seth A. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
24 | SCOVILL Tenzin S. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
25 | BAE Jason I. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
26 | POSY Daniel | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
27 | KASPER Aaron | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
28 | BROOK Joel | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
29 | HUANG Tom | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | HUANG Connor | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
31 | LI Yao (Liam) | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
32 | VILLARREAL Mateo | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
33 | PERRON Robert | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
34 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
35 | BELEV Nicholas | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
36 | PANEPINTO HATTORI Fernando | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
37 | HUROWITZ Max | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
38 | GONG Jerry | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | DOLSKI Jack | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
40 | BEAUCHAMP Declan | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
41 | COUNTS Nicholas | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
42 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
43 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | 16% | 49% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
44 | SHAO Peter | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | CHEN Alex | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | MAZUMDER Arul Rhik | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.