Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 2 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 33% | 3% | |
| 3 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 40% | 8% | - | |
| 3 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 6% |
| 5 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 16% | |
| 6 | BESSIRE Nolan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 7 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | |
| 8 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 95% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 9 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 10 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 6% | |
| 11 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | 1% |
| 12 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 6% | |
| 13 | WONG Adam L. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 14 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 15 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 16 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 97% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 18 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 20 | BANERJEE ANUP | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 58% |
| 21 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 22 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% | |
| 23 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 24 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 88% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | KOFROTH Zachary R. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% | |
| 31 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 68% | 20% | 2% | |
| 32 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
| 33 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | TSUEI Marcus | 100% | 34% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | NAM Michael | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.