New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Derek | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | CHENG Ethan | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | XU Andy P. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | GULCHIN Mark | D V D D D | V V V V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 5 | LEE Brendan | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | GHEDINI Luca | V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 7 | LI Bradley | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | TANG Terry | D V V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 9 | WONG Jackson | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | SIMONOV Timofey | V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 11 | HOU Gaven | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | TANG Royce | D V V V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 13 | FOGELSON Hugh | V V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | KIAYIAS Aris | V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | GERRISH William | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 16 | LIU ERIC | V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 17 | TAN Aidan | D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 18 | TOOMRE Luca | D V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | CHEN Ethan | V D V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 20 | ZENG Rick | V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | WANG Rory | D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 22 | HUANG Jinyao | V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 22 | SHANNON Jack | V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 24 | LEE Charles T | V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 25 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 26 | WONG Jacob W. | D D D V D V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 27 | KELKAR Aakash | V V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | GOLDYUK Steven | D D D D V V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 29 | TOOMRE Kai | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | CHO Xzander | D V D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 31 | XU Nathan | D D D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 32 | XIE Jicheng | D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | CHENG Logan | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 34 | KRZYWON Dylan | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 35 | CHEN Hanson | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 36 | PAULUS Gregory | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 36 | QIAN Zekai | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.