New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 2 | KIM Shaun M. | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 3 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 5 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 5 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 7 | OH Triton | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 8 | FIELDS Matthew S. | V V V D D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 9 | PENG Bryan | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | BAE Jason I. | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 11 | KILGALLEN William | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 11 | TASIKAS Stylianos | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | WU Wilmund | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | WEBER Mattias A. | V V V D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 15 | WANG Robert | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 16 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D D V D V D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | LEONARD Charles | V V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 18 | KOGAN Benjamin | V V V V V D | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 19 | DOLAN Charles R. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 20 | PIWOWAR Alex | D V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 21 | WAXLER Seth B. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 22 | STERN Tobias | V D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 23 | KUSHKOV Daniel | D V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 24 | HUANG Connor | V V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | MORALES Jonathan | V D D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 26 | HONG Robert | D D V V V D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 27 | ENGEL Peter | V V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 28 | LI Yao (Liam) | V V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 29 | SMINK Oliver | V D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 30 | DEKA Tanush | D V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 31 | KESSLER Josh | V D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 32 | EYBELMAN Ariel | D D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 33 | MOULTON Ian | V V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 34 | SHI Erick | D V V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 35 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | V V D V D V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 36 | GILSON Lucas B. | D D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 37 | MCCARTHY Devan | V D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 38 | MARGULIAN Grant | D V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 39 | PERRON Robert | D V D V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 40 | MENDOZA Luca | D D V D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 41 | DAI Gary | D D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 42 | KAPOOR Tanmay | D V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 43 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | V D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 44 | SHINCHUK Daniel | D V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 45 | TAUER Sam | D D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 46 | ANAND Sahil Z. | D D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 47 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | D D D D V V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 48 | GONG Jerry | D V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 49 | WRIGHT Zachary | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 50 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 51 | FLITSANOV Macabee | D D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 52 | HUANG Tom | D D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 53 | TIAGI Daniel | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 54 | KESSLER Nathan | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 54 | SHIPITSIN Yaroslav | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 56 | KUMAR Shivai | D V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 57 | WONG Caleb W. | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 58 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 59 | LIGH Checed | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 59 | STOLPER Max | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 61 | DESAUTELS Connor | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 62 | LAUB William | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 63 | FARMER Rohan | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.