New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
2 | YU Jaime L. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
3 | DU Hannah | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% |
5 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
6 | YU Lauren C. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
7 | GU Emily | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
8 | SU Michelle | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
9 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
10 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
11 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
12 | WU Julianna Y. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
13 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
14 | FU Qihan | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
15 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
16 | ROY Layla | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
17 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
18 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 5% |
19 | RENTON Samantha | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
20 | PERLMAN Talia | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
21 | XUE Alanna L. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
22 | SEO Irene Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
23 | JENKINS Hannah G. | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | |
24 | YE Eileen | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% | |
25 | CHARALEL Jessica | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
26 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 9% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
27 | ZHENG Julie | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
28 | WANG Jasmine | 1% | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
29 | YANG Lingting | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
31 | JIANG Claire | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
32 | RICHARDS Ella | 36% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
34 | MEYER Claudia | 6% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
35 | XIANG Emma | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
36 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 32% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | SCARLETT Skye | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
38 | LENZ Zoe N. | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
39 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
39 | MUSTO Isabella | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
41 | PAULUS Isabella | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | HUNT Abigail S. | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
43 | UNGERER Frieda | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
44 | FULIGNI Isabella | 34% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
45 | LEITE Alexandra | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
46 | POPOVA Polina | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.