Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 2 | CHIN Sophia J. | V V V D V D | V V V V D | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
| 3 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 3 | CODY Alexandra C. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 5 | XU Ellen | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 6 | ANDRES Katherine A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 7 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | D V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 8 | FU Linqian (Helen) | V D V D V V | V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 9 | KONG Isabel | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | KONG Carys H. | V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 11 | PATEL Riya | V V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | FANG Victoria W. | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | PLONKA Kaley V. | V D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 14 | D'ORAZIO Isabella | D D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | D D V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 16 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | D V D D D D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 17 | NOVICK Mia J. | V V V V V D | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 18 | MESCHIA Maggie | D V D V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | HURST Kennedy | V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 20 | BUHAY Rachel T. | D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 21 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | D V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | SHEARER Natalie E. | V D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | YANG Angelina | V D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 25 | HWANG Gabriela M. | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 26 | GOMES Diana C. | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 27 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 28 | BELTRAN Emilia M. | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 29 | DRAEKER Margaret | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 30 | HOLMES Emma | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 31 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 32 | WANG Zidan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | SHANNON Sara | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.