Boston Fencing Club - boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LI Brandon H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% |
| 2 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% |
| 3 | HOLMES Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 56% |
| 3 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 17% |
| 5 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 29% |
| 6 | LIU Niles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
| 7 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 26% | 3% |
| 8 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
| 9 | DING Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 17% |
| 10 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 11% |
| 11 | YANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 12 | HOLMES Stuart S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% |
| 13 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 4% |
| 14 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 15 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | 6% |
| 16 | LIU Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% |
| 17 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 10% |
| 18 | EVGENEV Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% |
| 19 | WANG Mason | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 20 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% |
| 21 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
| 22 | LIU Kevin B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
| 23 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 6% |
| 24 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 49% | 8% | - |
| 25 | JIMENEZ Diran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 18% |
| 26 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 27 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | LI Eric | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 10% | - |
| 29 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 14% | - |
| 30 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% | - |
| 31 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 8% |
| 32 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | FU Yifan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 29% | 3% | - |
| 34 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 81% | 34% | 4% | - |
| 35 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 80% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 81% | 36% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 89% | 38% | 6% | - | - |
| 38 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 40 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 96% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 91% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ARTIS Tre D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | BANKS Alexander S. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MOO Gareth G. | 100% | 96% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 46 | VARGAS Ernesto | 100% | 89% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 47 | BAO Chris W. | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 88% | 45% | 9% | - | - |
| 49 | CUTLER Andrew | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 50 | QI Steve | 100% | 89% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ZHENG Zhe | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 52 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 82% | 24% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | REN Bingye | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 98% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 54 | GARDOS Noah | 100% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LI Arvin | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 57 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LI Ayren | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | HOANG Michael | 100% | 39% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | SUTARIA Julian | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.