Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Sumin | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 2 | ZHU Heidi | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 3 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 3 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 5 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 5 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 7 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 9 | WU Amelia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 10 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 11 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 13 | LIU Christina A. | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | MOSKOFF Tessa | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 4% | |
| 16 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | |
| 17 | SUN Angelica | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 18 | LI Bingqi | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | CHOI Eunice | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | WEBER Nora | 4% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 21 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
| 22 | DANIEL Olivia | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | DRONAMRAJU Navya | 3% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 24 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 37% | 17% |
| 25 | XING Carol | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | GALLON Maya S. | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | GLICK Nina | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 30 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 32 | MOORE Audrey | 43% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | LEE Rachel | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | JEAN Olympe G. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | MESCHIA Maggie | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 36 | ELLENT Isabella S. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | GREGSTON Lailia B. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | MA ELISE | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | STRATTON Alexia | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | PRIDDY Hannah | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CHOI Grace | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 44 | YU Bailey | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | BARON Sabina | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LO Sabrina S. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 48 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% |
| 49 | YIN Grace | 3% | 26% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | KIM Annabelle | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 51 | BURCHETT Victoria | 25% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | FARICY Aislynn A. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | ODOM Megan A. | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.