King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOVACS Sophia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 2 | TAO Hannah J. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 3 | SHEALY Maggie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 3 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 5 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 6 | SHOMAN Miriam | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 7 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 8 | MADA Skye | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 9 | YUN Maya | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 10 | KATZ Anat | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 11 | BROWN Emma | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 12 | LI Victoria J. | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 13 | DANK Dina | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | YUAN Greta | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 15 | LEVITIS Danielle | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | DENNER Jasmina | 2% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | DRAGON Rainer | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 19 | HASSANEIN Toqa | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | CHIANG Emily | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | LIGH Erenei J. | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | BAKER Audrey C. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 23 | KRYLOVA Valery | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | JENKINS Scotland | 45% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | LIGH Karis | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.