King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 35% |
2 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
3 | JEAN Noe T. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
5 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
6 | GANTA Vijay | - | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% | |
7 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 28% |
8 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 29% |
9 | MORRILL Justin | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
10 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
11 | YUAN Kevin | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
12 | MAHONEY Colin M. | - | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
13 | WONG Ryan | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
14 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
15 | COLE Alexander | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
16 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 5% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
17 | CHAN Matthew | - | 6% | 29% | 46% | 18% | |
18 | ZHENG Edward L. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
19 | HO Kaden M. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
20 | MARGULIES William | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
21 | MORREALE John | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
22 | ALTIRS Alexander | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
23 | BRAR Sanjeet | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
24 | MORRILL William | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
25 | NG Jeremiah | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
26 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
27 | KIM Matthew | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
28 | DENG Andrew | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
29 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
30 | WU Wilmund | 2% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
31 | HONG Vincent Q. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
32 | REYES Kyle | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
33 | GHAYALOD ansh | 3% | 30% | 42% | 21% | 4% | |
34 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 3% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
35 | OVERDECK Andrew | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
36 | LEDERER Justin W. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | HU Andrew | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
38 | YOU Jaden | 23% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | |
39 | ZHOU Miles | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
40 | HAN Daniel Y. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
41 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
42 | ZENG Noah | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
43 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
44 | CHEONG Heonjae | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
45 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
46 | BULL Anderson | 4% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 4% | |
47 | GREENE Alexander J. | 1% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% | |
48 | NOBLE Colin | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
49 | CHEN Evan P. | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
50 | MATSUI Alen K. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
50 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
52 | HUANG Tyler T. | 2% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - |
53 | JANG Junhyuk | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
54 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 5% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
55 | POSY Daniel | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
56 | DA GRACA Aidan | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
57 | GOLD Jackson | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
58 | MIRDALA Drew | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
59 | LEE Aydan J. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
60 | CORTEZ Christopher | 31% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | |
61 | WEBER Mattias A. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | GLOZMAN Justin | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
63 | MOULTON Ian | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
64 | STERN Tobias | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.