Event Center at Valley Forge - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 2 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 3 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 3 | WANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 5 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 6 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 7 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
| 8 | TENG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 10 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
| 11 | GLOZMAN Justin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 13 | VOSS Jeffer | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 14 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% |
| 16 | DAI Gary | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
| 18 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 19 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | YOU Jaden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 21 | GOLD Carter | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 22 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 25 | SHI Jeremy | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | FELDMAN Drew | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 29 | FREDRICK Jameer | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | DEKA Tanush | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | MACKENZIE Calvin | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | KITTUR Devin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 7% |
| 34 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 35 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 36 | UH Daniel | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 37 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 38 | XIA Eric | 100% | 79% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | STUMACHER Ryan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HE Bowen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 41 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 8% |
| 42 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 43 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SHI Erick | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | GILPIN Samuel | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | HONG Robert | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 50 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Samuel | 100% | 91% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | BEAUCHAMP Declan | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | FTAIHA Ezra | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | AGARWALA Mukul | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | GOLDMAN Robert | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.