Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Amelia | - | - | 6% | 29% | 46% | 18% | |
| 2 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 3 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 3 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 5 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% | |
| 6 | LIU Christina A. | - | 3% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 7 | MOSKOFF Tessa | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 8 | XING Carol | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 10 | SUN Angelica | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
| 11 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
| 12 | GREGSTON Lailia B. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
| 14 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 15 | YOUNG Ashley | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% | |
| 16 | LEUNG Natalie | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | JIANG Corina | 2% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 4% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | LEE Sumin | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 20 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 30% | 46% | 20% | 3% | < 1% | - | |
| 21 | WEBER Nora | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 22 | MILLER Veronica | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 23 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
| 24 | DRONAMRAJU Navya | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | MOORE Audrey | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | - | 5% | 24% | 48% | 23% | |
| 27 | GALLON Maya S. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 28 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 1% | |
| 29 | DUNBAR Breck L. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 9% | 39% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | CHOI Eunice | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | - | |
| 32 | MA ELISE | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | DANIEL Olivia | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 34 | ELLENT Isabella S. | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | PARK Ashley Y. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 36 | MESCHIA Maggie | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | KIM Annabelle | 39% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | STRATTON Alexia | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | SCHMITT Ella | 43% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 55% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | BANERJEE Anika | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | GWATHMEY Teryn | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.