Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUNG Juliana K. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 2 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 3 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
| 3 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 4% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 5 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 6 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | ZHU Heidi | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 10% | |
| 8 | CHO Gracie L. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | PALMER Meredith K. | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
| 10 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 3% |
| 11 | YU Seneca | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 12 | OH Erin H. | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 13 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | SHIH Diane | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 16 | PENG Amber | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 17 | KOROL Dana | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | TAN Clarisse | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 19 | YEH Marissa E. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 21 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | KOROL Neta | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 23 | KLINE Melissa C. | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 24 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 25 | DING Abigail | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 27 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
| 28 | KIM Katherine | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 24% | 4% | |
| 29 | PANT Anisha | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 30 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | DUAN Konnie | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 32 | SUN Ruoxi | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 33 | ALTEN Ayaka | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 34 | CHUNG Jaein | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 35 | SUH Kailey E. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 36 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 36 | LEE Bethanie | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 38 | SU Alysa J. | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | LEE Isabelle | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | |
| 40 | KANG Jiyoon | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | YIN Helen | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | WANG Catherine K. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 41% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | WANDJI Anais | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 45 | LIAO Carly | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 48 | ROLOFF Katarina M. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 50 | WEBB Ella | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 51 | LI Angela | 32% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | SHUM Elizabeth | 33% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | LIU Michelle J. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CANNON Lira J. | 3% | 36% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | KOSLOW Amicie | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | HWANG Jungmin | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | SEIGEL Norah | 5% | 19% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 58 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.