Grand Rapids, MI - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
2 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | - | - | 10% | 89% | |
3 | YANG Lingting | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 42% | |
3 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | 2% | 25% | 50% | 23% | |
5 | COLLINS Anna | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 25% | 2% |
6 | PARK Leah | 6% | 32% | 44% | 18% | 1% | |
7 | MEYER Lily I. | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | - |
8 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 2% | 18% | 44% | 33% | 2% | |
9 | SOLOMIE Sabina | 1% | 13% | 46% | 33% | 7% | |
10 | RAYO Annalia | 20% | 56% | 21% | 2% | - | |
11 | COHEN Ava | 10% | 39% | 39% | 12% | - | |
12 | DOUGLAS Mara | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
13 | CHUANG Ramona | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
14 | HOOSTRA Lucy | 6% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - |
15 | MALONE Ella | 63% | 34% | 3% | - | - | |
16 | LONG Isabella | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.