Crescent City Open RJCC/ROC

Division IA Men’s Epee (D1AME)

Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 9:30 AM

Register

Riverside Hilton - New Orleans, LA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3126 3455 - 2597
5 - 8 2501 2688 - 2406
9 - 16 2246 2408 - 2106
17 - 26 1731 2133 - 1338

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Hurme, Tommi Olympian Fencing Club A23 3455 3151.28
2 Spier, Julian Ataba Fencing Club A23 3340 3056.83
3 Lee, Stewart Alliance Fencing Academy A22 3110 2856.98
4 Sanchez, Emanuel C23 2597 2313.23
5 Tiemann, Landen Olympian Fencing Club D23 2477 2202.70
6 Ray, William Mississippi Fencing Club C22 2432 2111.13
7 Alley, Everett T Birmingham Fencing Club C23 2406 2110.78
8 Singh, Arnav University of Georgia Fencing Club D23 2688 2093.38
9 Herndon, Liam Fencing Institute Of Texas E23 2305 2052.87
10 Phillips, Wesley Texas Fencing Academy D23 2408 1936.55
11 Lescure, Dimitri Olympian Fencing Club B23 2176 1899.78
12 Villareal, Quentin Houston Sword Sports E23 2182 1893.37
13 Ming, Nathan Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) B23 2141 1877.92
14 Hess, Marc Alliance Fencing Academy D23 2296 1862.84
15 Ribaudo, David City of Thunder FC B22 2352 1849.17
16 DADE, MAXIMUS Alliance Fencing Academy E23 2106 1827.98
17 Emmert, JP Alliance Fencing Academy C23 2065 1755.71
18 Zankowski, Brendan Sierra Blades Fencing Academy U 1975 1659.45
19 Chen, Leetyan Alliance Fencing Academy U 2045 1619.42
20 Geiger, Devin New Orleans Fencers Club U 2133 1434.19
21 Eshonkulov, Aziz Woodlands International Fencing Club U 1590 1172.04
22 Schwary, Irv New Orleans Fencers Club D21 1461 911.98
23 Hawley, Justin Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC U 1338 831.92
24 Starr, Michael Abilene Sport Fencing U 1501 729.38
25 Derham, Drew New Orleans Fencers Club U 1703 344.09
26 McInturff, Walker Unattached U 1497 164.33

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!