Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
2 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
3 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
3 | JING Emily | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
5 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
6 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% | |
7 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
8 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
9 | EYER Hailey M. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
10 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
11 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
12 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
13 | WU Irene M. | 1% | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
14 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% | |
15 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
16 | CHEN Allison V. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
17 | LI Grace Q. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% |
18 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
19 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
20 | HO Brianna W. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
21 | WONG Sophia M. | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 1% | 12% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
23 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 9% | |
24 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
25 | SU Michelle | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
26 | PERLMAN Talia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
27 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
28 | GU Emily | 6% | 43% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | |
29 | XU Christine | - | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 2% | |
30 | YU Lauren C. | - | 8% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | LI Meilin | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% |
32 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 12% | 53% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
33 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 1% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
35 | WU Julianna Y. | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
36 | PAVE Claire | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | HUNT Abigail S. | 3% | 57% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
38 | LIU Sophia | 3% | 41% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
39 | XIANG Emma | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
40 | YANIV Liya | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
41 | HUANG NATALIE | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - | |
42 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 32% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
43 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
44 | MEYER Claudia | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
45 | BROWN Brooke | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.