Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MORRILL William | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | WILSON Jude | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | KIM Shaun M. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 5 | WANG Robert | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 6 | OH Triton | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | DENG Andrew | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 8 | SHOMAN Noah | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | SAVOY Luca | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 10 | HUANG Ethan F. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 12 | HUANG Alexander C. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 13 | PENG Bryan | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 14 | ZENG Noah | V V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | HUANG Alex F. | D D V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 16 | MORALES Jonathan | D D V V D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 17 | PERRON Robert | V V D V D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 18 | KANG evan | V D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | TRAVERS Arnav A. | V D D V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 20 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | D V V D D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 21 | IDRISSI Idris | V V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | TANG Charles | D V D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 23 | STURN Oliver | D D V D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 24 | HUROWITZ Max | V D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | FITZPATRICK Evan | V D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 26 | OH Aster | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 27 | GONG Jerry | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 28 | LAUB William | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 29 | TAUER Sam | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | NEWMAN Matthew | D D D D V D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 31 | NGUYEN Anthony | D V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | COURTIN Frederic | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | LIN Philip T. | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 34 | ATWOOD Griffin | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 35 | LOWRANCE Robert | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.