Round Rock, TX - Round Rock, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZUBATIY Samuel | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | QIU Nathan | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | CHON Taylor A. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | AVAKIAN Alec | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | JIANG Anthony | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 7 | KIM Alexander M. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | HOLZ Daniel | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 9 | CRAIG Samuel | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | CHOI Silas | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | CHEONG Heonjun | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | KROON Lucas | V V D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 13 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 14 | LIM William J. | V V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 15 | KANG evan | D V V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 16 | PATIL Aaryan A. | D V D V D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 17 | STONE Esmond A. | D V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 18 | YU Thomas | V V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 19 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | V V D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 20 | YANG Dylan | D V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | CHAN Aidan | D D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 22 | SU Landon | V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 23 | LO Bradley | D D V D V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 24 | HRISTOV Kris | V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 25 | ZHOU James Y. | V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 26 | IDRISSI Idris | V D D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 27 | TSAI Michael T. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 28 | PAN Alex | D V D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 29 | HU Christopher | D D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 30 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 31 | KIM ELIJAH | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | CRAIG Andrew | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 33 | GUFFEY Christopher | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 34 | RODGERS Jacob | D D D V D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 35 | KERCHER Alexander | V D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 36 | JORGESON Charlie | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 37 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | D D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 0 | -3.2 |
| 38 | ROE Finnegan | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 39 | KENNEDY-DOMINGUEZ Cohen | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.