June NAC

Cadet Women's Épée

Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 1:30 PM

, - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 WATRALL Christina V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.4 6 +0.6
2 LIN Katie Y. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
3 KETKAR Mallika V V V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
3 GANDHI Sedna S. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
5 WANG Karen V V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
6 KETKAR Ketki D V V V V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
7 FALLON Kyle R. V V V V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
8 OXENREIDER Tierna A. V V V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
9 MCLANE Lauren V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
10 HU Grace V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
11 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
12 WU Amelia V V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
13 CHIN Isabella V V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
13 LEUNG Natalie V D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
15 GU Sarah D V D V V V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
16 CHAN Cheri K. V D D V D V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
17 REID Anousheh V V V V V V D 2.4 5 +2.6
18 LIU Christina A. V D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
18 RUNIONS Emersyn V V V V V D V D 4.1 5 +0.9
20 O'DONNELL Amanda A. D V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
21 KHAMIS Yasmine A. V V D V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
22 CAPELLUA Mariasole D V V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
23 MEHROTRA Anya V V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
24 CHEN Lefu V D V V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
25 GAJJALA Sharika R. D V V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
26 ZHANG Tina Tianyi V D V D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
27 ZUHARS Renee A. V V D V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
28 SMOTRITSKY Mia V D V D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
29 WANG Nora D V D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
30 LEE Michelle J. V D V V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
31 ZAFFT Tatiana M. V V V D D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
32 KUZNETSOV Victoria D V D D V V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
33 HAFEEZ Hania V V V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
34 TYLER Syd D V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
35 SMITH Grace L. V V V V V D D 3.9 5 +1.1
36 MACHULSKY Leehi D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
37 ALEXANDROV Katherine S. V D V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
38 YANG Miranda (Yinuo) V V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
39 PADHYE Tanishka V V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
40 BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. V V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
41 LUO Ashley D V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
42 JAKEL Sophia N. V D V V V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
43 HESS Heidi J. V V V V D D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
44 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. V D V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
45 MAO Amy V D V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
46 GITHENS Gracyn J. V D V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
47 LEANG Priscilla Y. V V V D V D V D 3.7 4 +0.3
48 DESAI Meera P. D V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
49 LIN Elaine V D D V V V D 1.0 3 +2.0
50 MALDONADO Pilar I. V D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
51 CHAN Elizabeth V V D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
52 YANG Alisa D V D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
53 MING Cynthia D V D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
54 NGUYEN Kira D D V V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
55 YOU Emily D D V V D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
56 DARANOUVONG Logan V D V V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
57 CHENG Ava V V D D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
58 SHEN Stephanie V V V D D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
59 MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) D D D V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
60 GUMAGAY Erika L. D V D D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
61 KORFONTA Jolie D V D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
62 GAO Judy D D V D V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
63 ZHANG Victoria R. V V D D D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
64 MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. D D V D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
65 PAPADAKIS Lily V V D D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
66 NGUYEN Kaylin A. V V V D D D 3.2 3 -0.2
67 YU Sheerea V D V D V D 1.2 3 +1.8
68 NING Emma V V D D V D 3.0 3 -
69 WEBER Nora D V V V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
70 CHOI Eunice V D V D V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
71 ELSTON Sophia D V D D V V D 3.0 3 -
72 WONG Alexandra R. V D V D D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
73 ZHENG Linden D D V V D V D 0.7 3 +2.3
74 NELSON-LOVE Lily B. D D V V D D 3.8 2 -1.8
75 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. V D D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
76 WANG Elizabeth D V D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
77 LAVERY Chloe K. V D V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
78 LIN Waiyuk D V V D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
79 YAO KATHARINE V D D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
80 SANTA Bianca Estefania V D V D D D 2.0 2 -
81 ZENG Katrina V V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
82 FURMAN Maria D D V V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
83 MESCHIA Maggie D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
84 KIM Zoe L. V D D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
85 MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. V D D V D D D 3.3 2 -1.3
86 YOON Katherine D V D D D V D 0.7 2 +1.3
87 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia D V D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
88 LONADIER Keira D D D V V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
89 LI Alisha V V D D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
90 CHIRASHNYA Noya D D V D V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
91 JAKEL Alysa C. V D D D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
92 LU Junyao D V D D D V D 4.3 2 -2.3
93 SAAL Anna V D D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
94 CAI Catelynn D D V V D D D 0.4 2 +1.6
95 PRIHODKO Nina D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
96 AHUJA Arianna D D V D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
97 HAFEEZ Hiba D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
98 ABRAMSON Mariela R. D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
99 NGUYEN Tallulah D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
100 PEELER Julia D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
101 LEE Yedda D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
102 PINNAMANENI Drithi D D D V D D 0.4 1 +0.6
103 RICHARDSON Lauren C. V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
104 SCHULTZ Gillian D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
105 JAMES Josephine V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
106 CHERNIS Zoe C. D D D V D D 3.3 1 -2.3
107 KORKIN Alice V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
108 KRUMHOLZ Nicole V D D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
109 CHANG Ella D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
110 COSTA Leah D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
111 SENYUVA Su D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
112 LIU Nicole D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
113 MACEDON Gianna D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
114 SHERTZ Kira E. D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
115 GELMAN Emily D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
116 HICKS Grace D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
117 MAMEDOVA Farah D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
118 HAMILTON Nina M. D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
119 KIM Erika S. D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
120 MIHILL Margaret D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
121 WELLS Emily D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
122 LORENZO Isabella D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.