June NAC

Cadet Women's Foil

Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 1:45 PM

, - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 GUO Jessica Zi Jia V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.9 6 +0.1
2 JING Emily V V V D V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
3 KIM Rachael V V D D D V V V V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
3 APELIAN Katherine D V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
5 SHEN Sophia H. V V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
6 LEE Brianna J. V V V D V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
7 FANG Sabrina D V V V V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
8 KNIGHT Skylar V V V D V D V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
9 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
10 QIAN Crystal V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
11 HO Brianna W. V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
12 STUTCHBURY Carolina J. V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
13 KONG Chin-Yi D V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
14 SHEN Lydia V V V V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
15 HALL Velma V V V V D D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
16 MILLER Naomi E. V V D D D V V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
17 KLINE Melissa C. V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
18 ZHENG Ivy V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
19 MASSICK Laine V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
20 KOO Rachel A. V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
21 TAN Kaitlyn N. D V V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
22 OH Erin H. V V D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
23 PERLMAN Talia D V V V V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
24 DAVIA Daniella V. V V V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
25 CHEN Jessie S. V V V D V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
26 GRIFFIN Emma G. D V V D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
27 YU Seneca V V V D D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
28 CHUSID Mikayla D D V V V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
29 LIU Jaelyn A. V D D V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
30 KIM Katherine V V D V D D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
31 TALAVERA Daena D D D V V V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
32 JO Mia C. V D D D D V V D 3.3 1 -2.3
33 CHEN Jia P. V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
34 PETROVA Kristina V V V V D V D 5.4 5 -0.4
35 LI Phoebe J. V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
36 LOCKE Savannah D V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
37 YU Lauren C. D V V V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
38 ZHAO Sophie L. V V D V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
39 NISSINOFF Alexandra V V V V D V D 3.1 5 +1.9
40 KOREN Lihy Peer V V V V V D D 4.0 5 +1.0
41 WANG Ellen V V V V D D 3.9 4 +0.1
42 GUERRA Sofia E. V V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
43 CHO Cameron S. D V V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
44 HUNG Juliana K. V V D V V D V D 5.0 4 -1.0
45 SADAN Jordan E. V V D V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
45 NAMGALAURI Mariam V D V V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
47 YHIP Mikaela M. V V V D V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
48 DUAN Konnie D V V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
49 CHO Gracie L. D V D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
50 LI Meilin D V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
51 GAYDOS Sofia C. D V D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
52 CHEN Allison V. V V V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
53 KHOO Lauren A. V D V V D D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
54 EYER Hailey M. D V D V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
55 KOENIG Charlotte R. V V D D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
56 ZHANG Alina C. V D V D V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
57 SHAW Kayla M. V D V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
58 SEO IRENE Y. V V V D D D V D 3.0 3 -
59 HE Fenghuan D D V V D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
60 MCGILLION-MOORE Katie D D V V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
60 SENIC Adeline V D V D D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
62 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. D V D V V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
63 DEBACK Greta I. D D V V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
64 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" D V D D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
65 SARTORI Taylor M. D V D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
66 PAHLAVI Dahlia V D V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
67 SERBAN Samantha M. D D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
68 FERNANDES Thea D V D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
69 LEE Bethany W. V D V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
70 WONG Sophia M. V D V D V D 1.5 3 +1.5
71 KOSTELNY Alexis V D V V D D D 3.2 3 -0.2
72 LI Rachel Y. D V V D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
73 MEI Sarah D V V D D V D 1.1 3 +1.9
74 OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. V D V V D D D 1.1 3 +1.9
74 WU Julianna Y. D V D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
76 OUYANG Bridgette Z. D V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
77 LESLIE Ryanne T. V D D D V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
78 ORVANANOS Anice V D V D V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
79 BATRA Chaahat D V V D D V D 3.0 3 -
80 KONG Olivia D D V V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
81 LIN Ashley D D V V V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
82 HECKMANN Emma D D V V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
83 CAO Arianna L. D D V V D D 3.6 2 -1.6
84 XUE Alanna L. V V D D D D 2.0 2 -
85 LEE Lavender D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
86 HUANG NATALIE V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 GU EMILY D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
88 JANG Kimberley D V D D V D D 3.6 2 -1.6
89 SMIGRODZKI Nymeria D D D V V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
90 UPTON Elizabeth V D D V D D D 3.6 2 -1.6
90 ZULUETA Catherine D D V D D V D 0.5 2 +1.5
92 TALWALKAR Apoorva D D D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
93 WEINTRAUB Io H. D D D V D V D 2.0 2 -
94 LIU Sophia D D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
95 SUN Chien-Yu V D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
96 LEE Ariana D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
97 CHO Rebecca H. V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
98 PENG Amber L. D V D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
98 SULEIMAN Alysa J. V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
100 ZHAO Aileen Y. D V D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
101 WU Irene M. V D D D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
102 HAYES Alyssa R. D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
103 SU Michelle V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
104 LEE Ji Ahn V D D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
105 DATLA Medha D V D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
106 DE LA CRUZ Eden D V D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
106 MUSTO Isabella D D D D D V 0.9 1 +0.1
108 ZGOMBIC Emily D D D D V D 0.7 1 +0.3
109 HSIUNG Samantha D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
109 ZAMELIS Madelyn D D V D D D 0.3 1 +0.7
111 ASCHETTINO Aurora D D V D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
112 HSIEH Rebecca D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
113 WANDJI Anais D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
114 TAN Clarisse D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
114 LEE Fiona E. D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
116 LI Sophia M. D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
117 YANG Lingting D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
118 KENNEDY Elizabeth D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
119 THIRUVENGADAM Harini D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
120 BRADFORD Meeah D D D D D D 3.5 0 -3.5
121 SULEIMAN Alena J. D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
122 QIAN Zhiyan D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
123 SCHMIDT Victoria D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
124 HSIEH Sabrina D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
125 DATLA Meha D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.