, - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
2 | GUO Jessica Zi Jia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
3 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | |
3 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
5 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
6 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% | |
7 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% | 1% |
8 | CHO Sabrina N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
9 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
10 | CANDESCU Diana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 11% |
11 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
12 | HORSLEY Asherah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 16% |
13 | TAN Helen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
14 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
15 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
16 | LUONG Paige K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% |
17 | PUSTILNIK Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 29% |
18 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
19 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
20 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% | |
21 | CATANTAN Samantha Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% |
22 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
23 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
24 | MARINELLI Ever | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
25 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
26 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
27 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
28 | DRUCK Lior | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
29 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - |
30 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
31 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 99% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
33 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
34 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
35 | YAROSHENKO Karina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
36 | TALAVERA Daena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 39% | 8% | - |
37 | FLANAGAN Catherine H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
37 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
39 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
40 | LI Grace Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 49% | 7% | |
41 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
42 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
43 | KLINE Melissa C. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
44 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
45 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
46 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
47 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% | |
48 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
48 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 23% | |
50 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
51 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
52 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
53 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 2% | |
54 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
55 | LEE Annora Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 3% |
56 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
57 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - |
58 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
59 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
60 | MARTOS Sara A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
61 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - |
62 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
63 | ATLURI Srija | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
64 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
65 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
66 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% | |
67 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
68 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
69 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 11% | |
70 | GONG Christina S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
71 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
72 | HOSONO Rei W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
73 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
74 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
75 | ABAYEVA Sasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
76 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
76 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
76 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
79 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 94% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
80 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
80 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
82 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 50% | 6% | |
83 | CHUSID Renata M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
84 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
85 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 97% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | |
86 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
87 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - | |
88 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% |
89 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
90 | REN Olivia Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
90 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
92 | LEE Paulina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 5% |
93 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
94 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
95 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
96 | KOREN Lihy Peer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
97 | YE Eileen | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
98 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
99 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
99 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
101 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
102 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 15% | 1% | - | |
103 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
103 | WALKER Mayah J. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
105 | DU Hannah | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | |
106 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
107 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
108 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
109 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - | |
110 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
111 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 92% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
112 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
113 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
114 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - |
115 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | - |
116 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
117 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
118 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
119 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 96% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
120 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - |
121 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 99% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
122 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
123 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
124 | CHOI Lenna K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% | |
125 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
126 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | |
127 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
128 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
129 | BRADFORD Meeah | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
130 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
131 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 64% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
132 | HUNT Tarleton Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
133 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
134 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
134 | SU Michelle | 100% | 92% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
136 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 73% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
137 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
138 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 63% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
139 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
140 | DATLA Medha | 100% | 25% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
141 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 81% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
142 | LEE Fiona E. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
142 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
144 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
144 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
146 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
146 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
148 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 61% | 12% | - | - | - | |
148 | GU EMILY | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
150 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
150 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
150 | DATLA Meha | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
153 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
154 | MCKEVITT Caitlin R. | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
154 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
154 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 48% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
157 | LEE Ariana | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
158 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.