Pasadena Convention Center - Visitors Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
2 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% | |
3 | KOROL Neta | - | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
3 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 37% | 9% | |
5 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
6 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | |
7 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
8 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
9 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 28% | |
10 | CUI Amy | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
11 | PANT Anisha | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 40% | 11% | |
12 | KOROL Dana | - | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 22% | |
13 | PATTERSON Natalia | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
14 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | 2% | 28% | 45% | 22% | 3% | |
15 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 1% | 14% | 43% | 42% | |
16 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
17 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | |
18 | HAN Crystal | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
19 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
20 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
21 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
22 | SUN Emily | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | HWANG Alison | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
24 | DO Leila | - | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | |
25 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
26 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 2% | 29% | 45% | 21% | 3% | |
27 | OTEYZA Camille | - | 17% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | |
28 | HAN Ashley | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | HOBSON Ava | 6% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
30 | LUO Annabella | 27% | 65% | 8% | - | - | - | |
31 | DUAN Konnie | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
32 | LEE Brielle | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
33 | BECKSTEAD Makayla | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
34 | MUñOZ Isabella | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
35 | CABALU Alaina | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
36 | LEE Allison | - | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
37 | KO Claire | 4% | 52% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
38 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | UHM JIAH | 24% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | LUH Mia P. | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | |
41 | MORENO Francesca | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
42 | MCKAY Teresa | 69% | 31% | 1% | - | - | - | |
43 | WILSON Liya | 53% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
44 | CHANG Janelle | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.