Duluth, GA - Duluth, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
2 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
3 | HONG Steven | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
3 | ZHANG Derek | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
5 | ZHOU Hudson L. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
6 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
7 | ZHANG Ethan W. | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
8 | DILLE Jackson K. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
9 | ANAND Rohan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
10 | VAUGHN Jason | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
11 | VAID Luke | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 43% | 10% |
12 | MONTALVO Emmeric | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
13 | MAY Griffin M. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
14 | MAHAPATRA SAMARTH | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
15 | MEHTA Krish | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
16 | WU Richard | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
18 | FANG Eason | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
19 | HUNG Samuel | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
20 | DECK Tyson | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
21 | GUYDOUK Alexey | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
22 | GUREVICH Savely | 6% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
23 | ZHAO zimo | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
24 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
25 | STOLL Fuller | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
26 | WANG Justin | 4% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
27 | WANG Max | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
28 | MONTALVO ashur | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.