Neil Lazar RYC/RJCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:00 AM

Register

Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2097 2193 - 1956
5 - 8 1898 1974 - 1816
9 - 16 1613 1766 - 1421
17 - 25 1561 2136 - 1298

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Henderson, Louis Axis Fencing Club U 2193 1913.22
2 Koren, George Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 2155 1888.95
3 Lim Juwana, Maximilian Bergen Fencing Club U 2084 1833.87
4 Shapiro, Leo Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1956 1702.05
5 Zaletaev, Jacob Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1974 1673.94
6 Hagn, Maximilian Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1973 1630.94
7 Zhang, Howard Integrity Fencing Studio U 1816 1511.69
8 Gilbert, Ari Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1829 1493.59
9 Sabino, Bennett Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1766 1478.78
10 CIECIEREGA, MATTHEW Bergen Fencing Club U 1702 1414.86
11 Suh, Jordan Manhattan Fencing Center U 1694 1379.15
12 Knobel, Benjamin Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1733 1266.46
13 Risman, Edward Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1627 1204.57
14 Wang, Harrison Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1497 1179.72
15 Wong, Jacob Olympian Fencing Studio U 1463 1061.82
16 Katz, Isaac International Fencing Club U 1421 998.01
17 Rabel, Alexander Scarsdale Fencing Center U 1603 982.03
18 Zhang, Mark Integrity Fencing Studio U 1365 970.33
19 Brooks, Grant Olympian Fencing Studio U 1387 968.83
20 Chan, Brady Stamford Fencing Center, LLC U 1513 921.98
21 Chung, Hahnsooh Candlewood Fencing Center U 1730 900.97
22 Parrish, Lucien Olympian Fencing Studio U 1469 641.16
23 Gibbons, Robert Olympian Fencing Studio U 2136 593.61
24 Marino, Mark Bergen Fencing Club U 1298 531.10
25 Wu, Yuchen U 1545 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!