AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC Div1A/Vet

Youth 8 Men’s Foil (Y8MF)

Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:00 PM

Register

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1906 2144 - 1788
5 - 8 1621 1742 - 1522
9 - 16 1456 1833 - 1190
17 - 27 943 1419 - 526

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lu, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center U 2144 1880.17
2 Sun, Roy SoCAL Fencing Center U 1890 1612.31
3 Turbat, Travis Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1801 1540.26
4 Huang, Owen SoCAL Fencing Center U 1788 1515.63
5 Mazaheri, John Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1742 1484.61
6 Lozano, Koen Alexander LA International Fencing U 1623 1336.33
7 Li, Yunze Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1597 1265.18
8 Yu, Ethan U 1522 1220.85
9 Sun, Lucas Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1478 1182.24
10 Raj, Yojith Maximum Fencing Club U 1585 1178.91
11 Yin, Luke SoCAL Fencing Center U 1481 1120.00
12 Liu, Michael Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1471 1036.23
13 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1318 1031.05
14 Khairul Anwar, Iqbal North Bay Fencing Academy U 1833 965.43
15 Meng, Andy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1190 881.27
16 Zhang, Bosen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1288 831.29
17 Lee, Reiden Maximum Fencing Club U 1077 652.09
18 Li, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 997 634.62
19 Valencia, Hunter Denver Fencing Center U 1419 618.84
20 DONG, YIKUN Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 903 496.83
21 Folomeev, Dmitrii Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1265 334.26
22 Wang, Eavan SoCAL Fencing Center U 1047 265.89
23 Lee, Roland Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 949 191.85
24 Cremel, Louis Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 634 64.18
25 Dulai, Hukam Fresno Fencing Club U 805 56.24
26 Chen, Alwyn Edmonton Fencing Club U 526 < 0
27 Santiago, Aidan Maximum Fencing Club U 746 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!