Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KOROL Neta | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 2 | WU Kyra | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 3 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 3 | KOROL Dana | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 5 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 6 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | 10% | 37% | 39% | 13% | |
| 7 | PENG Amber L. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 8 | SHUM Elizabeth | 4% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 10 | SHIH Diane | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 11 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
| 12 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 13 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 14 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 19% | |
| 15 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 16 | HSIUNG Samantha | 3% | 38% | 42% | 16% | 2% | |
| 17 | KANG Jiyoon | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% |
| 18 | RAO Sonia D. | 2% | 18% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | YIN Helen | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% |
| 20 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 21 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% |
| 22 | LEE Allison | 17% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CHOI Kailyn | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 24 | CABALU Alaina | 13% | 45% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | WHITESIDES Ella K. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | PATTERSON Natalia | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.