Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | V V V V D | V V V V V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 2 | COSTIN Michael V. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 3 | VILLASENOR Aaron A. | D V D V V | V V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 3 | SINGER Carson | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | DHINGRA Gian K. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | JEAN Noe T. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | YANG Ziyi | D D V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 8 | PORTMANN Stein J. | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 9 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 10 | LEITH Jack | D V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 11 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | WESLER Logan A. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 13 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | YUN Jaesun | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 14 | CHANG Colin S. | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 16 | BREIER Satchel E. | V D V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | ROBERTS Sam | V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 18 | XU William | V D V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 19 | STONE Esmond A. | D V V V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 20 | CHON Taylor A. | V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 21 | REYES Xavier M. | V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 22 | KIM Andrew H. | V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 23 | LI Joshua L. | V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | TANN Justin | V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 25 | BAUER Hank E. | V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 26 | REED Samuel J. | V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 27 | KOTOV Leonid | D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 28 | HOUTZ Jackson | D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 29 | BARBER William S. | V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 30 | JIANG Anthony | D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 31 | NOBLE Daniel | D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 32 | PATIL Aaryan A. | D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 34 | COVINGTON Max G. | V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 35 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | D V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 36 | WANG Eric Y. | D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 37 | JEFFORDS Alexander | D D V D V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 38 | VO Minh Q. | V V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 39 | HASNAH Henry | D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 40 | JINICH Ilan R. | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 41 | ZHANG Yankun | V D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 42 | GHENEA George Philipe | V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 43 | LIN Daniel | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 43 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 45 | LIU Christopher X. | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 46 | CHENG Albert | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | CENTENO Zachary | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 48 | KORINTH Alexander J. | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 49 | WALLACE Taylor | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 50 | BYON Julian | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 51 | PLONKA Derek | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 52 | KROON Lucas | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 53 | BYON Adrian | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 54 | CHANG LAWRENCE | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 55 | KORINTH Steve | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.